>>
>>Actually Victor has a point. She was obstructed and out-maneuvered by beneficiaries of the status quo.
>
>John, John, John
>How you go on!
>So, let's be sure that we get this right.
>If she passes legislation that lets people do whatever, she's some kind of heroine who fought the bad guys and is showered with praise.
>If she tries and fails, she's some kind of victim and gets no blame- rather she gets plaudits for bucking the bad guys.
>How does one lose in that scenario?

If the legislation is a good thing for the American people - then one can't loose in that scenario. (and shouldn't)

>In fact, she never should have been involved in the health care situation.
>She was a discredited lawyer with a cloud over her head (Whitewater) who had never had a real job and was married to a philandering draft-dodger who happened to have been elected president.
>Without the draft-dodger, she couldn't have been hired as a dog-catcher in Washington.
>Great qualifications to lead a major change in health care, right?
>She wasn't qualified to lead a Girl Scout troop.

If you think that - then you don't know much about her. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Clinton