Leading questions, bordering on straw man: One of the facts percolating to common awareness is that while a PK-like identifier is clearly better, profiles without such an identifier can be good enough for probable identification. Given that such identification is possible, arguing that MS [probably today] not going the last step to identify is IMO similar to propose carrying a loaded weapon into mass transport and leaving it there - but not shooting anybody with it yourself.
>Please provide evidence that a) personally identifiable information is being sent and b) Microsoft is using this to track you specifically and not aggregating it into non-identifiable information.
>
>
>>It is at least in that way that courts can only order to turn over data which was transmitted. The fault is with MS
>>a) by NOT enabling the user to opt out totally of messaging home
>>b) by (probably) erring on the MS POV what is necessary to send home
Previous
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only