>>For me rationality was clearly proven to be out of the room by the time the "tax scandal" was discussed. Whole discussion revolved about Trump being able to write off a biz failure and condemming him to "evade paying taxes perhaps up to 18 years". As long as no ***artificial*** losses were written off (which sometimes exist in tax codes for real estate, but were not hinted at in any article I read), why concentrate on that - which is probably the only safety measure to curb runaway taxation by shortened tax periods - instead of trying to expose him as a con man probably being worth not even 10% of the sums he boasts about and destroying his "success" image.
>
>The whole idea beind taxes is to gather small amounts from the many and scatter to the few wealthy. What's wrong with Donald?

As the whole answer is tinged with sarcasm, to argue the above line in earnest might be chasing (not even fighting...) windmills

>
>This is capitalism. It's designed to make to rich richer ...
>And Donald is that what the word middle class realy means. Somebody who runs a business owend by himself. Not: White collar worker or business folk A real captialist just let the capital work (aka hedge fond), while the rest simply owns nothing to talk off.
>
>Clearly he has no qualification for the job he is applying for, and over the edge on the job he is doing (delusions of grandeur).