>Regardless of how much you may dislike Hillary Clinton or her policies, she has the experience, she has the skills, she has the temperament to be President. It's not even close.

I agree with your statements on Trump. But I see the experience and skill issue quite differently.

First, let's dispel this "temperament" canard. Harry Truman had a horrible temper but also had some good qualities as a leader. Trump is horribly immature (that's an understatement) - but that doesn't validate HRC simply because she hasn't behaved the way Trump has.

Then again, read the quotes from the just-released Goldman Sachs speeches - and ask yourself whether she sounds more like Trump when she's "in private".

Now, on the issue of "experience and skills", one can type out an entire book to respond to that one. I'm going to name four.

- The FBI release notes slammed her lack of understanding of standards and procedures regarding the handling of classified information. There are several reports that career FBI investigators felt strongly that HRC should lose her security clearances. So we have a potential commander in chief who has already been blasted...BLASTED...by the FBI for a poor demonstration of "skills".

- Her defense of the ACA, even with her acknowledgement that major aspects are badly crumbling, shows a total lack of "creativity" in solving problems. Her statements in the last debate clearly indicate she thinks you need massive government acts to archive specific targeted legislation on the (very few) good points of ACA (such as pre-existing conidtions). In our industry, we refer to this as "bad architecture".

- She has no formal executive experience. (Being married to someone who does, doesn't count). As far as I'm concerned, no one should be able to run for president without a full term as a governor under his/her belt. (That doesn't mean a full-term governor is automatically qualified.). The closest she has to executive experience is her four years at the State Department, and that's not exactly a period she should be proud of.

- Her level of dishonesty (and the level of dishonesty from her camp) should scare everyone. I don't need to type out details for what's obvious - she clearly thinks she is above the law , and this administration has seen fit to carry that out and protect her.

She might not behave in public as badly and as crudely as Trump - but I fail to see any merits of her actual "skills". The only thing I see is a mainstream media and a corrupt national committee (the DNC) doing everything to pave the way for her.