What's GetAll() ?
>>In your example all records would be returned anyway - it's just a question of where the sorting takes place.
>>
>>Linq to Sql filtering such as .Where() should be translated to the T-SQL equivalent so you won't be getting all records so I'm not sure what type of statements you are referring to?
>>Can you give an example of your problem showing the linq query and the T-SQL execution ?
>>
>>
>Here is one of the samples
>
>
> var emails =
> _contactsEmailAddressesLinkAdapter.GetAll()
> .Where(e => e.ContactId == contacts.ContactId)
> .ToList();
>
>When I look into profile, I see that it just runs select of all rows from the table. So, filtering is done on the client as opposed to SQL Server.
>
>I am going to write 3 stored procedures right now to return the information I need the right way in one select statement. Because currently this line of code follows a loop
>
>
>var emailList = new List<EmailAddresses>();
> if (emails.Count > 0)
> {
> var emailId = contacts.PrefEmId;
>
> var tempEmailList = new List<EmailAddresses>();
> foreach (var email in emails)
> {
> var em = _emailAddressesAdapter.GetById(email.EmId);
> em.EmailAddressTypes = _emailAddressTypesAdapter.GetById(em.EmTypeId);
> if (contacts.PrefEmId == email.EmId)
> {
> // First in the array
> emailList.Add(em);
> }
> else
> {
> tempEmailList.Add(em);
> }
> }
> emailList.AddRange(tempEmailList);
> }
> contacts.EmailList = emailList;>
>Instead of this highly inefficient code I'll write a statement returning right info and in the right order. I can do it using direct SQL statements, but I think SQL procedure may be a better choice.
