Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
The NY Section is filling up quickly
Message
General information
Forum:
News
Category:
Social
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01642197
Message ID:
01642247
Views:
24
>>>>> You don't have to like HRC to admit she's qualified for the job
>
>Victor, I don't like HRC as a candidate precisely because she "isn't" qualified for the job. From everything I've seen, all explanations of her being "qualified" are circular arguments.
>
>I've asked this question several times, and no one will answer.
>
>How can a person be qualified when, according to the FBI, that person does not understand classified markings? (And for that matter, the person was storing and transmitting classified information at the time, on an unsecure and unauthorized server)
>
>In addition, how can someone be qualified when that person continues to make the completely flawed promise of debt-free college for all families making under 125K a year?
>
>How can someone be qualified when every major financial analyst group (even non-partisan ones) has blasted her economic plans as unsound?
>
>How can someone be qualified when that person patently (and repeatedly) misquotes/misrepresents one of the larger Supreme Court cases of our time (Roe v Wade) and ignores the statistics that a significant percent of late-term abortions are elective?
>
>How can someone be qualified when that person participated in the sequence of events that contributed to the growth of ISIS? And for that matter, how is a person qualified when that person ignored the brewing issues of Al-Q in Libya that led to the embarrassing attack in Benghazi on the anniversary of 9/11?
>
>Very curious to hear answers. And there's one rule - no invoking Trump as a comparison. It's already a given that Trump is 100% unqualified. I would like to hear arguments of HRC's merits that neither mention Trump, nor "tenure" in the government.

You're right - this is going to end up as a circular argument. It seems unfair not to compare her to Rump because that's who she's running against... I can go back and argue each one of these points but that that will end up as circular arguments too. I guess my overall point is that despite her flaws, she actually has had a lot of positive success stories during her 30+ years of public service too - and the guy she's running against has none.
ICQ 10556 (ya), 254117
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform