>>> You don't have to like HRC to admit she's qualified for the job - and arguably one of the most qualified candidates ever to run.
>Victor. Look at what you just wrote.
>Do you really think that she is more qualified than George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, James Madison, or Ike was - or FDR in his second, third and fourth terms?
>That's OK, we sometimes get carried away on here.

Wellllll....if you mean John Adams the 6th president - he is known as one of the worst presidents we've had - errrr can't say that for John Adams the 2nd president lol lol (I know a lot about these two as they're my way-back-grandfathers - we're directly related :) )

>However, that sounds like what they said about Nixon when he ran against JFK- that he was one of the most qualified candidates.... etc.
>It looks as if her winning margin, while not quite matching Nixon's margin over McGovern, will be a whopper.
>She has several of Nixon's traits.. paranoia, mendacity and arrogance.
>She'll also share Nixon's position as one of the most detestable and detested people ever to win the office.
>After he won by that huge margin, those traits caught up with Nixon and he was gone.
>If we're lucky, she won't last in office as long as he did in his second term and she can just steal some more china and get out of our collective sights.

I would rather deal with her as president than Trump though, yes?