Well she said a few days ago that she was part of the "never Hillary" thing- which means anyone but Hillary (which of course makes no sense to me - because it's going to be either Trump or Hillary) - so with this narrow minded outlook, all you're going to hear is just that - anyone is better than Hillary - so by default Trump is ok no matter what because he is not Hillary - so since nothing else matters I'd have to agree with your brick wall assessment. Sadly this single minded viewpoint is all too common with the American voter, which is why you end up with a racist womanizing sexual predictor with zero political experience that still seems to be getting 40% or so of the votes in the polls being taken. 320 million people in the USA to pick from - and this is the dipshit the GOP give us...and sure enough people line up for the guy. geeeze - tells you something about our education system. What I find most disturbing is that I didn't realize just how many racist, homophobic, and indifferent to women's health and rights people there are in my society - I mean I knew there were SOME, maybe even quite a few, but I never had any idea how bad it really was until this election. Quite sad realization for me I have to admit.
And don't think that Trump is going to go away after this election either - he is already attempting to undermine our democracy by saying the election is rigged, and just like he did with Obama he will try to delegitimize her presidency. And of course these fools will follow along like a bunch of stupid sheep.

And your attitude is open-minded HOW? Please demonstrate. You are a part of the never Trump crowd which means that you will vote for HRC no matter how many criminal acts she has gotten away with. Or are you thinking about voting for Gary Johnson, Jill Stein or Evan McMullin instead?

BTW, I give idiots who subscribe to and practice Saul Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals" philosophy zero credibility.

* RULE 1: “Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.” Power is derived from 2 main sources – money and people. “Have-Nots” must build power from flesh and blood. (These are two things of which there is a plentiful supply. Government and corporations always have a difficult time appealing to people, and usually do so almost exclusively with economic arguments.)
* RULE 2: “Never go outside the expertise of your people.” It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone. (Organizations under attack wonder why radicals don’t address the “real” issues. This is why. They avoid things with which they have no knowledge.)
* RULE 3: “Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy.” Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty. (This happens all the time. Watch how many organizations under attack are blind-sided by seemingly irrelevant arguments that they are then forced to address.)
* RULE 4: “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.” If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules. (This is a serious rule. The besieged entity’s very credibility and reputation is at stake, because if activists catch it lying or not living up to its commitments, they can continue to chip away at the damage.)
* RULE 5: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions. (Pretty crude, rude and mean, huh? They want to create anger and fear.)