>>Trump once said that he wouldn't care if someone referred to his daughter as a nice piece of ___ (I forget the actual words but it was very close to that).

It was similar to that. So yes, he has a disgusting potty mouth and blurts out cringe-worthy soundbites. The recent departure of despairing political advisors also suggests that he may not be good at taking advice. That last attribute is targeted accurately by HRC when she asks whether you'd want his finger on the nuke button.

>>You know that I am not a liberal and certainly not a feminist - but I detest Trump. Not just for his treatment of women, but really his treatment of many individuals in general.

Serious question: had Trump's boasting not been recorded and had he been persuaded not to slang off about Mexican walls or other cringe-worthy soundbites: does that change his capability as POTUS?

How about accusations of rape? Turns out that Trump also has been accused of rape earlier this year as well as participating in Epstein's pedophilic romps.

HRC isn't immune: today there's claims coming out from somebody who says he was one of her fixers, that she was in an open marriage, had a widely-known affair with a staffer who suicided, and had trysts with female hookers. Does that alter her capability as POTUS?

FWIW, it used to be popular to claim that the US President is elected as leader of the free world. Actually, s/he is elected as leader only of the USA, with free world leadership voluntarily acknowledged by other nations by default. That took a huge hit when it became popular to sling off at nations who (for example) refused to see the Emperor's clothes/WMD. What effect will these scandal-prone candidates have? Does it even matter?