>>>>>>FWIW, I'm also concerned to see the conservative media repeating the lie that only 10% of Clinton Foundation expenditure is on charity, with the rest going on salaries and trips. In fact the Foundation does very well getting $ to the coal face. Right now there's so much mud being thrown that it's sticking to everybody and each mudpat is just as likely to hit the hurler themselves as anybody else.
>>>>>
>>>>>According to the Washington Post, they donated to their own charity, The Clinton Foundation.
>>>>>
>>>>>http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/12/clintons-charity-themselves/
>>>>>
>>>>>96 percent of their charitable funds went to their own Foundation.
>>>>
>>>>Right, and the Clinton Foundation is doing very good work in the world.
>>>>
>>>>Tamar
>>>
>>>
>>>Well, Okay. :-)
>>
>>If you don't believe me, maybe you'll believe Charity Navigator: https://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summary&orgid=16680
>>
>>Tamar
>
>What always bothers me about the Charity Navigator (which I do check for charities I give to) is the item Programs. Only they know how much of the moneys given to a "program" goes back into the pockets of Clintons. Just one example, is the salary of Chelsea Clinton (from what I heard, starting at $600,000 and up to $900,000 now). I am sure you will find many links "explaining" why she is worth so much money :)


You heard wrong. None of the Clintons has ever been paid by the Foundation. That one is easy to check because non-profits have to file a form 990 (which is like a 1040). They show all salaries. You can pull at least one of the Clinton Foundation 990s up from Charity Navigator.

Tamar