>So far all I've heard about is some problems in Portland. I'm watching the news right now and there is a discussion about how peaceful the NYC protests have been along with many of the other cities.
>
>ROFL and LOL!!! And exactly what are your news sources? The Huffington Post? VBG.
>
>The job of the president does not involve telling people to abandon their right to protest, so I would not expect him to do so.
>
>Neither would I. As I have said repeatedly, I am an avid supporter of the first amendment. Something that you apparently are not - if someone expresses an opinion that is different from yours, all you want to do is to shut him/her up - kinda like those poor college students that require a safe space. However, I DO believe that part of the president's job is to speak out against violence (which apparently you are so blind that you don't see)
>
>Marcia - ya know people are upset that people like you have voted for, and thus supported racism - so in effect these protests that you're complaining about is your own fault. If you don't want the protests - I suggest that you should not be supporting racism. As a so-called product of the 60's protests you claim to be, you should be ashamed of yourself right now and so some soul searching instead of blaming others for the result of your own actions and others like you actions.
>
However, I do know that since you have smeared my reputation by accusing me of supporting racism here in writing in a public forum.
They call this libel. I suggest that you cease and desist with your personal attacks against me. There actually are laws against this sort of thing...


You don't need victor for that. You're more than capabel to do that yourself. Look in the mirror Marcia... look into the mirror.