>>I am also sure that you have shoulders that are a lot broader..

Can you and V not now agree that you both want the best for your country?

V isn't an outlier. Many here say they had to hold their noses as they voted. Certainly the MSM conditioned the population to expect a different result which multiplies the desire to vent. Hence the protests that seem to mix personal animosity towards Trump with disappointment in the Republic and the archaic Electoral College that disconnects a popular vote (though on current figures, Trump may pick up the popular vote as well.) IMHO they probably do have a point about the Electoral College that may have made sense before there was a roading network but isn't necessary in 2016. The protestors have no interest in rioting and will be disappointed that their free speech is overshadowed by violence. There may even be some "false flag" activity to give Clintonists a taste of their own medicine revealed in Wikileaks.

FWIW, my own experience is that a riot just happens. I saw a free concert in a town hall square turn from a cheerful event into a burning car-overturning window-smashing furor, in about 10 minutes. So if these protests are accompanied by people itching for a rumble, it's a dangerous situation. Probably time to wrap up the protesting and get on with life. Meanwhile it's probably helpful not to taunt and provoke. We don't take pleasure in the unhappiness of others, do we?

Meanwhile Trump is toning down his plans for walls and deportations. Instead of showing optimism or trying to reassure people who take Trump literally, the biased MSM continues its behavior with headlines like "Cracks emerge in Trump's campaign promise on immigration" and gloating that Trump and Paul Ryan seem to have different ideas. Trump has shown he can succeed despite the MSM and he's just going to keep banning these organizations, reducing them to second-rate regurgitation of interviews and news reporting by others. Certainly it's a shame if reporters won't reach out to the millions they misled to share the message that hey, it may not be as bad as we thought. If they won't do that, then what good are they to Trump? Which is a lesson that organizations like NYT seem determined to learn the hard way.