>
>I don't have time to figure it out, but have checked the total population of those 30 states against the total of the other 20?
>

And exactly what difference would that make?

Trump won the election, period. A state isn't "called" until the strength of victory exceeds any uncounted (e.g. absentee) ballots.

Look, it's a given that HRC was going to win NY and CA by a strong margin. But that's (partly) why the EC exists - to smooth out variances. If you all of a sudden decide that popular vote is all that matters, then the candidates get to campaign all over again, possibly with a different strategy.

As I said before, HRC won less states than Sanders won. She won less states than either Romney or McCain. Those are far stronger arguments than leading the popular vote by a few hundred thousand, especially since absentee ballots haven't been counted.

Let me ask a simple yes/no. I'm basically asking you the same question Chris Wallace asked Donald Trump. Do you, or do you not, accept the results of the election?

I'm not asking how you feel about the results. I'm asking if you accept the results. Yes or no.