>>> don't you think it would of been better for Trump to just pick a less controversial person?
>
>He did select the very safe Reince Priebus for Chief of Staff which is said to be one of the most powerful positions in Washington, but that has been largely ignored in the rush to criticize his choice of chief strategist and senior counselor.
>
>I suppose he could try to appease his enemies, but the MSM still seems determined to criticize at any opportunity. If you're damned if you do and damned if you don't, you might as well do what you're comfortable with.

Yep that's right. I don't really care for Priebus' take on the Keystone XL Pipeline - but you have to admit that this guy was a good (and very safe) pick for Trump. The MSM is more interested on controversy than reporting on anything good. It's the "if it bleeds, it leads" mentality of how they pick stories. Of course watching this guy attempt to defend Trump's honesty doesn't look real good either. http://www.politicususa.com/2016/05/15/rnc-chair-reince-priebus-hilariously-struggles-defend-trumps-honesty.html
I do have an issue with those who will support their party's nomination no matter who it is - and this guy falls into that category.