>So do you not believe that >90% of scientists are convinced human activity is causing global warming
>
>Actually, I DO believe that the majority of CO2 emissions are caused by human activity - perhaps we should all stop breathing. Every time we exhale we are spewing CO2 into the atmosphere - not to mention what kind of green house gasses are coming out of the other end of human beings and farm animals ;)
>
>I remember that when we were in NZ in 2003 they were trying to levy carbon taxes on cows and sheep (of course their owners were the ones who actually has to pay the taxes) for methane. There was a campaign to fight against these taxes:
>
>Fight
>Against
>Ridiculous
>Taxes
>
>BTW, you are forgetting that in Newspeak it is not "global warming" anymore - it is "climate change"

FWIW, it was Republican operative Frank Luntz who pushed to say "climate change" instead of "global warming."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Luntz

"Although Luntz later tried to distance himself from the Bush administration policy, it was his idea that administration communications reframe "global warming" as "climate change" since "climate change" was thought to sound less severe."

That sentence is footnoted to this article: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2003/mar/04/usnews.climatechange

Tamar