>>>BTW have you swallowed some sort of right wing pill or had Kevin Goff finally got to you ?
>
>LOL. I try to be a scientist, meaning that you have to describe what you see the animal doing, not what your theory says it should do.
>

Actually, 2 corrections. First, I'm not a right-winger. How many right-wingers do you know who are OK with gay marriage, completely non-denominational, and pro-choice up to viability?

I'm more a "Liber-pendant" :)

It's just easier for some people to use the "right wing" brush when the target doesn't fit a "theory".

And as for the last line ("what you see the animal doing"), if you read prior posts, you'll see I've been saying the same things you are now. Admit it - you like the view. :)