>>>What he says is that he's going to undo all of Obama's changes. Of course, who knows what to believe from what he says.
>
>Right- after all, he accepted the result rather than undermining democracy as his detractors claimed (before self-righteously doing it themselves) and rather than defiantly doing as he pleases regarding conflict of interest as is the unique privilege of President, he says he's dissociating 100% from business interests to focus on running the country.

That's absolutely not true. What he seems to be saying is that he's leaving the everyday running of the business, but he's put his kids in charge and put them on the transition team. Huge conflict of interest.

>His anti-Semite appointments turn out to have widespread support even in Jewish groups who espoused "never Trump" and rather than being the neophyte political bungler predicted, he's not even waiting until 20 January before conducting a miracle for 1000 workers in Indiana which is worth more to millions of blue collar workers than a decade's worth of talking bobbing heads in Washington.

Right, he's written a script for manufacturers across the country to hold up the government for favors. I think Republicans were supposed to be the ones opposed to the government choosing winners and losers.


>Must make it difficult to keep up the criticism when Trump keeps not following the road to calumny laid out for him, but I have great faith that all those neutral observers will find a way. ;-) My attitude remains unchanged: to paraphrase Keynes, "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do, madame?"

The facts haven't changed. This is setting up to be the most corrupt administration in living memory. It's also setting up to be incredibly conservative, far beyond any mandate he might have, given that he lost the popular vote and got a narrow Electoral College victory. Some of what he's said and done so far indicates an all-out war on voting rights is coming.

Tamar