>> In the recount case, the "spectral fears" did not materialize because democracy was protected by a judge. I like that, because it creates a precedent that may make a future presidential candidate think twice before speaking about rigged systems when invoking sparse anecdotal evidence. That is the plus value in all this.

Sorin, please- you need to read the judgments because your narrative is 100% opposite what the judges said. And if you want to be taken seriously, you need to stop tarring Trump with a brush that was applied to Stein in a judgment you obviously have not read.

>>Hmm. Not fair! You implied that clear evidence in RNC hacking is crucial at this point. It would indeed be relevant if it could be proved one way or another. Unfortunately, the claim that "the RNC was not hacked" lacks falsifiability. Also, I don't think is that relevant. BTW, the claim that RNC was hacked was initially advanced by CIA (they act on narrative), and I am not so sure that FBI goes along with it.

Without hacked Republican dirt, the whole narrative about Russians wanting to damage HRC, falls apart.