>>It's useful in looking at the state of the electorate from one angle, but otherwise meaningless.
Campaigning and voting would be very different if it were a national ballot. For example: under the electoral college system, CA Republicans might as well not vote for president because CA is overwhelmingly Democrat. So if 3.5M Republicans nevertheless voted in CA, how many more would vote if they knew it actually mattered? We cannot say, which is why it's meaningless to paste results from one process into another.
As an aside, Trump won the national ballot outside CA and it was just 4 cities in CA that gave it to HRC. My question would be: is it really fairer to allow 4 West Coast cities to overturn the wishes of the more populous rest of the nation? If that's fair, then why not for Congress as well - you could save a bomb by only holding the election in those 4 cities while the rest of the nation meekly accepts the result.
"... They ne'er cared for us
yet: suffer us to famish, and their store-houses
crammed with grain; make edicts for usury, to
support usurers; repeal daily any wholesome act
established against the rich, and provide more
piercing statutes daily, to chain up and restrain
the poor. If the wars eat us not up, they will; and
there's all the love they bear us."
-- Shakespeare: Coriolanus, Act 1, scene 1