>> I watched about 2.3 debates this time, a bit more than usual, but never before in such debates did my logic center ask he rest of the brain if that had really been uttered...

I watched all 3, or at least had them streaming as I worked. Trump complained more than once that he was up against a team of HRC plus media interviewers, which of course was confirmed in due course by Wikileaks. That was the most disquieting for me: if he was correct about systematic collusion between MSM and favored candidate, which is such unexpected democracy-subverting behavior that they both ought still to be hanging their heads in shame- how many other of Trump's eccentric claims, also are true?

Meanwhile check out this caustic Canadian piece re those naughty Russians: come on NSA, something concrete is needed very soon...

http://www.globalresearch.ca/how-an-evidence-free-cia-finding-alleging-russian-interference-in-the-us-election-was-turned-into-an-indisputable-truth/5563458

Also take note Democrats: in the absence of credible proof, you're gifting Trump the opportunity to play the international statesman hero, smoothing relations with Russia that is increasingly annoyed at what it calls "indecent" accusations. President Trump will find it easy to save the day and can tweet for years to come about saving the world from WWIII that HRC, the DNC and the MSM almost provoked. Don't appreciate that? Well, you're doing it to yourselves. Put up or shut up about the Russians.