>>The big problem is that the Muslims from those countries are not moderate. They want to come here to kill us. You DO understand that, don't you?
>
>Well, keep in mind something - many of the refugees from these countries are moderate Muslims who have been attacked by ISIS. They are the victims of radicalization, not advocates.
>
>That's part of the problem - the proverbial 98-99% of the refugees are victims - the very small remaining percent are the ones who can carry out attacks that kill many. There are no easy answers.
>
>Unfortunately, the Obama administration wanted to dramatically increase the number of refugees and simultaneously paint anyone who objected as bigots. There are other ways to help refugees without endangering security. We protected Kurdish regions in NW Iraq from Hussein - we could similarly have worked to create safe areas inside Syria. I'm not saying it's easy, but Obama took the easiest path that allowed him to attack his political opponents. He is responsible for part of this problem and has used his solution to paint others as xenophobic.

Do you understand the process involved in becoming a refugee? The percentage of applicants vs approvals? Do you realize they can't even pick which country it is that they are going to end up? Or that this process takes almost 2 years?

There are no terrorists hiding a refugees coming to the United States. It's not only this most impractical way it's also by FAR the HARDEST WAY TO ENTER THE COUNTRY.

There is no proverbial 1% or 2% of them that are terrorists than can make it though all the hoops in hopes of carrying out an attack in the USA - any such belief is utterly ridiculous and purely unfounded.

The last place we should be looking for terrorists in among the refugees that have gone though the hoops to be a refugee.