Information générale
Catégorie:
Codage, syntaxe et commandes
Hi Dimitry,
I remember asking myself whether I should:
1) let the list of parameters of a central routine of a complex to grow massively,
2) re-organised the code with some sort of "state-object" (yep just a plain old custom object).
I was in a hurry and decided to stick to solution 1). I can certainly say that I was wrong. Passing a pretty large number of parameters ? Possibly that's the the time to incorporate at least ONE "state-object" resource to be passed as a single parameter possibly along with other parameters that may be kept as standalone atomic parameters. It both improves the reading and reduce the clutter.
all this IMVHO of course, Daniel
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Voir le fil de ce thread
Voir le fil de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement
Voir tous les messages de ce thread
Voir tous les messages de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement