>>Could be Nordstrom for "treating his daughter's business so unfairly"
That I cannot understand. Of course the MSM tried to stir it up, but Nordstrom presented it as a business decision. We all know Ivanka will be somewhat busy on other things for the forseeable future, so she could have shrugged it off and it would have gone out. Suddenly, petrol is added and the MSM gleefully fan the flames. Of course.
One part of me says good on dad for sticking up for his daughter. But communicating a beef with Nordstrom via Twitter? Sheesh. Either there is a subtext yet to be revealed, or this just creates more slogans for those constantly hunting for fault.
"... They ne'er cared for us
yet: suffer us to famish, and their store-houses
crammed with grain; make edicts for usury, to
support usurers; repeal daily any wholesome act
established against the rich, and provide more
piercing statutes daily, to chain up and restrain
the poor. If the wars eat us not up, they will; and
there's all the love they bear us."
-- Shakespeare: Coriolanus, Act 1, scene 1
