>>Which arguments do you have to not move fully to SQL Server and abandon VFP Tables?
>
>Some arguments were given earlier in this thread:
>1- support clients who can't afford or don't want a SQL database
>2- be able to migrate clients one by one without supporting 2 code bases

That's why the argument for Azure hosting is becoming more and more practical.

I agree with Christian and was going to make that point to Sandy - was just curious what version of SQL Server they were using.

If they were using the Enterprise edition of SQL 2012 or greater, there are many significant features in the database engine that are worth tapping into.

So like I said, unless there is a compelling reason to need to stay with Fox tables (and if Azure for hosting isn't an option), I don't agree with an app supporting both Fox tables and SQL tables. That kind of dual support is likely more driven by the developers that anyone else.