>>>Like all good conspiracy theories voter fraud comes with absolutely no concrete evidence.
>
>Well, there is a groundswell of evidence including jailed or deported illegal immigrant voters and confirming records that can only be obtained by suing, as well as video evidence of corruption.
>
>But here's the important thing: as per the tried-and-true military rule, competence requires responding to *capability* not just what pops up in plain sight. There's almost infinite capability to defraud the US voting system in many states.
>
>You want evidence? The only way to get that evidence, is to investigate validity of votes cast. Which is what Trump proposes.
>
>>>It does seem like there will be an effort to make voting harder which may hit democrat voters more. Maybe you'll be required to prove membership of an up market country club like Mar-a-Lago before you can vote.
>
>Or less hysterically, maybe something like the UK where you have to register to vote and follow polling information sent to you by Council? About half of US states already have something similar, fwiw, and the sky did not fall.
>
>>>After all why should wealth creators only have the same voting power as the little people.
>
>With respect- this is why Trump won. It's plainly obvious that voting rules are too lax, but people who themselves manage to cope with much more stringent rules, nevertheless insist on conflating it into an impropriety when Trump wants to investigate and fix it. All over the world, people are sick of Newspeak and want to hear a spade called a spade, which is what Trump keeps doing.

"there is a groundswell" there you go then all the proof you need

"including jailed or deported illegal immigrant voters " how many 10, 100, 1000, 10000 or "a lot"

" video evidence of corruption" where ?

There are occasional voter fraud problems in the UK. Typically care home sometimes come under suspicion for intercepting residents polling cards and submitting postal votes on their behalf. Like most countries the obvious fraud is politicians not telling the whole truth about their intentions. the referendum was a case in point. Both sides where pretty selective with their campaign messages.