>>>" As reports of racist, anti-Semitic and Islamophobic harassment and attacks poured in after the election of Donald Trump, many Americans wondered whether they represented a nationwide increase in hate crime. "
>>
>>>*
>>
>>"Many Americans?"
>>
>>Sounds like a couple of editors at the New York Times.
>>
>>This is unadulterated anti-Trump hogwash.
>>
>>As I've said here before, when I studied journalism the NY Times was the gold standard.
>>If I had ever submitted a paper containing claptrap like this, I'd have been thrown out of the class.
>
>Good analysis.
>It is a pity that the NY Times is debasing their good name like this.

I'm interested. If the MSM are so unrepresentative, tell lies , misinformation etc. Why are they still (I assume) getting market share. I know in the UK papers like the Daily Mail sell well because we have a significant number of right wing bigots. Are the MSM representing a significant group in your country ?