Environment versions
Network:
Windows Server 2016
Virtual environment:
VMWare
Hi Rosty,
Last time, I tried the compiler stuff - on an oldish machine with very limited resources - the whole compilation locked up:( I admit that the last time I compiled stuff - in a C or C++ manner - was 1997 (was WATCOM C compiler and the output were FLLs...).
I admit to not having not "built" anything from C sources since. No compiler of any sort and I try hard to avoid getting my feet wet on these issues that are certainly not simpler in 2017 than in the early 90s..
Of course I appreciate the effort by Chuanbing has put into his set of tools A LOT. And I'd be glad to understand what this 64-bits compiler is bringing to VFP. But I am not enthused by the minor quirks solved and a bit upset by the chances that activeX and COM-objects may not work!
My questions on (in no particular order !):
1) are the VFP advanced tools producing VFP-style executables (with a requirement for a series of runtime dlls) ?
2) is the VFP compiler tool producing standalone Executables (with NO requirement for dll) ?
3) is the VFP speed untouched (quite wary on this one!)? Is the runtime memory use decent?
4) can you except a reasonably complex VFP9 application - with its pack of dependencies to activeX and COM-based stuff (both MS-Office and third-parties) to work decently ? Is that true for the 64-bit version as well?
5) deployment conditions of the executables built with Chuanbing tools?
A bit lost on these questions. Sorry if I am a bit dumb here!
Daniel
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only