>>>Sorry, but the moment I heard of use of sarin, I felt like it was 2003 again. Or 1998 or 1992 for that matter. We've all seen so many reports on staged, false-flag (or even false footage) operations that my first reaction is "now let's see who needed this as an excuse to bomb someone".
>>
>>Lets not beat around the Bush: both dates do not ring a bell with sarin (jap subway was mid-nineties IIRC).
>>First Gulf war already over by 1992 and in the trouble around your home area, while conflict at these dates, no recall of sarin ?
>>
>>somewhat baffled
>
>Use of chemical warfare was the major selling point for the Irak war.

I remember chem as talking point in the Iran/Irak scuffles, but for first Irak war Saddam visiting Kuwait was the big point. As oil probably was more important in decision making than people, I might have adjusted my mental filters back then...

>The other dates are about here, where each major event of the kind was used as a pretext to start one. There were serious doubts and very visible orchestration of media.

The conflicts in your area were seen here with disbelief and astonishment. I am pretty certain our gov had no far reaching plans and was not eager to send german troops elsewhere. They stayed away from 2. Gulf War, back then asking quite impolitely for real proof of WMD. I saw"our" involvement in your area more like a doorman keeping 2 drunk patrons from knifing each other, hoping both of them would get sober and clean up your differences with posturing, perhaps fist fights and face-keeping talks.