Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
Strike on Syria
Message
De
12/04/2017 15:34:58
John Ryan
Captain-Cooker Appreciation Society
Taumata Whakatangi ..., Nouvelle Zélande
 
 
À
11/04/2017 21:07:50
Information générale
Forum:
News
Catégorie:
Événements
Titre:
Divers
Thread ID:
01649950
Message ID:
01650109
Vues:
34
>>A friend runs a picture framing shop here in Hamilton. She was swamped with orders from black families for framed pictures of Obama.

If Trump voters did that, people would call it evidence of the White trash racism that swept Trump into power. But it's a silly argument: surely the same white trash racists/sexists who purportedly gave it to Trump, should have come out in droves to vote against Obama because of his skin color. Except that they didn't. They may have mobilized to support Trump- but they didn't mobilize to oppose Obama. Seems to me that this whole argument smears an awful lot of Flyover folk who may be afraid to admit their intentions to hostile pollsters- for obvious reasons- but know how to exercise a vote.

FWIW: when HRC and Obama were competing in the Presidential primary, a very clever man in Flyover country told me that people may be biased against Obama for being black, but they're more biased against HRC for being a woman.

And so it came to pass.

These are not caricature white trash Trump voters described here: these are *Democrats* we're talking about, participating in a Democrat Primary.

So if people insist on blaming the electorate: maybe Obama voters stayed home because the candidate was a woman. Perhaps HRC is correct that misogyny contributed to her loss- except that she ought to be poking the bone at her own, and making sure she has the correct explanation for people who came out for Obama but stated home for her. Was it Democrat racism, misogyny- or both- that cost her the election?

I don't actually believe this construction- surely her gender was far less of an issue than the smell of dirty tricks, cheating, contrivance and disrespect for voters that dismayed so many- but it's a logical extension of insisting that Obama voters came out in droves for him, but stayed home for her.
"... They ne'er cared for us
yet: suffer us to famish, and their store-houses
crammed with grain; make edicts for usury, to
support usurers; repeal daily any wholesome act
established against the rich, and provide more
piercing statutes daily, to chain up and restrain
the poor. If the wars eat us not up, they will; and
there's all the love they bear us.
"
-- Shakespeare: Coriolanus, Act 1, scene 1
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform