>>>I dont want to purchase refox
>>>
>>>If anyone has a copy I could send my executable and would be willing to psy £50 for a conversion
>>
>>Are you aware that you are actually offering to pay someone for doing an illegal job for you?
>
>Unless you know the laws about EULAs in the UK and the way REFOX is distributed, it might be very legal. An EULA is not neccesarily a legal agreement.
>
>>Most people buy Refox for one reason, and one reason only, and that's to decompile programs where they have lost their own source code. I have never lost my source code, but if I ever do I think it's only fair that I pay full price for fixing my own blunder.
>
>Whether the software has been purchased for only one reason or for many, does not make a difference in whether an EULA is legal or not. Its not relevant
>Whether it is fair is an entire different question though.. It depends of many different subjective opinions.
>
>There could be many reasons for decompiling source code. For example, the orginal developer is gone and the source code is as well, but the company using it is the owner of the software (By default, this is the case if the customer pays for its developement in The Netherlands unless there is a contract between the developer and the customer).

I am not a lawyer. Anyway, I think unethical is a better word in this case.