>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>I would like to know if the following approach is possible and how. I am showing the pseudo code in exact order it has to go:
>>>
>>>1. The program creates a Cursor Adapter and of course it has a cursor. Lets name is CA_Cursor.
>>>2. The code populates/fills this cursor CA_Cursor with some records (getting them from the DB).
>>>3. The code updates this cursor CA_Cursor but does not update the DB (that is, Tableupdate() is not fired).
>>>4. The records from the CA_Cursor are copied/appended to another cursor (of exactly the same structure). Say, named CA_Second.
>>>5. Steps 2 - 4 repeated several times. Therefore, the cursor CA_Second now has records from every iteration of steps 2-4.
>>>6. Detach cursor CA_Cursor from the CA object and Attach cursor CA_Second to the CA object.
>>>7. Execute TableUpdate() to update the DB
>>
>>Why not have two cursor adapters, the first one sending no updates?
>
>Thank you. But this won't work for my case.

Why do you need a CA on the first cursor at all? The 2nd cursor sends updates, give it an adapter. The first seems like a temporary place where you crunch the records but it does it strictly locally (and I guess you requery or zap it between batches sent to second cursor), so IMO it could be just a simple cursor without an adapter.