>>
>>Perhaps, we're talking about different things. How much credibility are Trump's rants rendering to the presidential office?
*
>OK
>That's a valid question.
>If you stop quoting nonsense we can have a serious dialogue.

No need for that kind of a remark. I quoted those who published the study about the media negativity to show possible reasons for the results.

>A couple of questions:
>How credible was Mein Kampf?
>Have you read it?
>GWB said "Let's fight 'em over there so we don't have to fight 'em here", killed hundreds of thousands of innocent people and was re-elected. How did that happen?
>Does credibility matter?

Yes, I have read it, though I fail to see how that would disqualify credibility as a required attribute for leaders. What I see is the need to check their philosophies against history lessons. That would be more of a discussion about Bannon, not Trump.
How much a leader lacking credibility is able to accomplish? And what are his allegiances?

>Do you care about what happens to people or what people on TV say about what the president says?

For this discussion, I care about what the president says and what kind of reaction it prompts both here and in the rest of the world.
*