>By "choice of URL" do you mean an unauthorized email server in her home with classified information traversing it? ;-)
>

Yes.
No one has shown a single instance where that choice had an effect on the life of anyone in the world- except a politician or a journalist.

She's a horrible person- OK- but that email server choice was a non-event.

However, if you repeat a lie often enough - the server blah blah blah .. it becomes truth to some people and it might have contributed to her loss.

Mind you, had she been a less despicable person, it wouldn't have mattered, but in this case it might have.



>>>The problem is that all that nonsense has an effect.
>
>Yes it does- until people decide it's all nonsense and stop paying attention. According to the most recent Harris poll, two thirds of US voters now associate the MSM with fake news. They're writing themselves out of political relevance IMHO.

Agreed. I think it's a death rattle.

It doesn't take a genius to conclude that someone who is reporting what someone else has tweeted is supernumerary.