>>Yes. That's my point about her server. Lots of "might haves" but in the final analysis nothing of significance was ever tied to its existence.
Actually the FBI showed that at least one account on the server was hacked/breached, allowing the hacker to Tor into the server and browse emails:
https://vault.fbi.gov/hillary-r.-clinton/Hillary%20R.%20Clinton%20Part%2001%20of%2009/view . The FBI was unable to determine who this was, but current narratives require that it simply must have been the Russians, hacking into a system bulging with government emails including thousands of classified ones.
Which is a perfect case example of why you're supposed to use secure systems provided by the employer. Check out 12 FAM 544.3 from 2005, itemizing State Department requirements for transmitting government communications across the internet:
https://fam.state.gov/FAM/12FAM/12FAM0540.htmlAnd here's the State Department Inspector General's report confirming willful email security breaches by 3 members of the Obama administration including Clinton:
https://oig.state.gov/system/files/esp-16-03.pdfFinally, see if you can find the 6/18/2011 "all staff" cable sent to US officials warning that personal email accounts could be compromised and officials should “avoid conducting official Department business from your personal e-mail accounts." The name on the bottom of the cable was Hillary Clinton, though she denied ever seeing it in her written testimony.
Remarkably, the WAPO did not give her a pass on this as MAGA fans would predict, instead effectively carving her a new one:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/clintons-inexcusable-willful-disregard-for-the-rules/2016/05/25/0089e942-22ae-11e6-9e7f-57890b612299_story.htmlThe issue that still gets me, is Comey's contradiction that these breaches were not willful and as there is no intention to breach, there's no criminality. But US laws re state secrets make merely *jeopardizing* classified material a crime even if the Inspector General and WAPO are wrong about it being deliberate, and it was just a big misunderstanding.
"... They ne'er cared for us
yet: suffer us to famish, and their store-houses
crammed with grain; make edicts for usury, to
support usurers; repeal daily any wholesome act
established against the rich, and provide more
piercing statutes daily, to chain up and restrain
the poor. If the wars eat us not up, they will; and
there's all the love they bear us."
-- Shakespeare: Coriolanus, Act 1, scene 1