>>So, let's see...
>>HRC- "Bill, honey, I'd like to jeopardize some national secrets today.>>I thought about calling the North Koreans and handing over some nuclear stuff they've been trying to steal... but I think I'd rather send some emails about dinner parties with diplomats to some friends on a private email server."

ROFL. But contrast with sailor Bryan Nishimura who stored classified material on his own machines rather than on approved supplied devices. When he learned he was under investigation, Bryan destroyed some material but the FBI was able to recover some (because he failed to delete aggressively and use bitbleach I assume.) The FBI stated that it had no evidence that he intended to distribute the information- but he was charged. His punishment included never being allowed security clearance ever again, which ends his career.

My understanding is that the statutes define removal/storage of classified material in disallowed/unsecured locations or destruction of it as "gross negligence," which explains Bryan's fate. How about HRC?

As I keep saying, denying malintent does not make you innocent- though it might affect your sentence. Your joke skirts over this just like Comey and the MSM.