>>To this day, there is still ZERO evidence that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia to change the election. The far left continues to push this narrative to distract from HRC's embarrassing loss.
>
>Even if it had colluded with Russia to change the election, what laws were broken?

Yeah Fox News keeps saying that over and over. Well now doesn't that sort of depend upon tings? Federal campaign finance law prohibits a “foreign national” (such as the Russian government) from spending money to influence U.S. elections.In this case, it would violate at least three different campaign finance laws if Trump campaign advisors coordinated with the Russian government.


>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Segretti
>
>Here's someone who did some serious interfering with campaigns on behalf of Nixon.
>The best they could nail him for was a misdemeanor charge of handing out false campaign literature.
>Had the stuff Segretti was handing out been true - however disparaging it was - he'd have gotten away with it.

Nixon's case wasn't as serious because it didn't involve a foreign government.