>>>Look those were just the first two links I found - I'm sure if I dug deeper I could easily find psychologists or psychiatrists...
>
>But you've already made the allegation as a statement of fact. Surely you already have credible evidence to support your stance? If not, then QED. Along with the "breaching WI electoral laws by speaking to voters lining up" - how are you getting on with those videos you promised? Or is that to be another "no question about that" proof?
>
>>> Is he a habitual pathological liar? Yes obviously - no question about that.
>
>That's a psychiatric diagnosis that you've failed to back up with credible expert evidence, apart from being sure you can find some if you look. Reality check: I'm sure you can't find any.

Are you suggesting that he's not? Look at how he lies? You don't need to be a scholar to figure out he has a problem.

>>> Does he see things that are not there? Yes no question about that either.
>
>Delusions? Evidence please.

All the invisible people he claims were at his inauguration or the millions of invisible illegal Mexican voters, his delusions that climate change is a foreign conspiracy, him saying he is working harder than any president in history, etc etc etc -- come to mind....,

>And on and on it goes.

Indeed it does - just look.

>Sorry but building a huge stack of accusations "no question about that" does not prove your contention. If anything, it does the opposite because those are NOT the tactics of the truth seeker.
>
>In fact, those are the tactics of a Russian misinformation campaign.
>
>>>Now tie all that in with some illegal activities with the Russians and his family violating the Logan Act and profiting from whatever policies he puts forth --- dude you have to see this is bad right? I mean if you sit here and rationalize this to the point where you've convinced yourself it's all either OK or a bunch of fake news then....then I dunno.
>
>As I keep saying, YOU are the one making the contentions so YOU are the one who needs to demonstrate cause for your certainty. You can't and despite trying, nor can anybody else after 300 days of investigation and counting. Instead the MSM subjects us to Benjy's tale of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
>
>My view? I'm with KG who observed that you feel obliged to support Trump because of all the undesirable behaviors stacked against him. "The enemy of my enemy is my friend" so IMHO people who value democracy and fair process are being pushed onto Trump's side by increasingly transparent anti-intellectual and anti-democracy practices.