>>>>
>>>>Yes, O'Reilly panders and that's too bad, but do does the "mainstream" media.
>>>>
>>>>I never watched him - I don't have the channel- but a lot of people do, and we should be asking why.
>>>
>>>O'Reilly had an M.O. that I partly liked. Just like Denzel Washington's character in the movie Philadelphia would say, "Explain this to me like I'm a five year old", O'Reilly would often stop a convoluted argument by saying, "I'm a simple man, explain this in basic terms to me so that we can all understand it".
>>>
>>>As someone who taught for five years, this is a great approach - as a starting point.
>>>
>>>And I appreciate that O'Reilly wanted the country to be TOUGH on drugs. I am a straight arrow when it comes to drugs and I agree with most of his positions.
>>
>>I didn't even agree with him on that - my thoughts are that drug abuse should be considered a health issue vs a legal issue - and lets be honest here, the 'war on drugs' is a failure and has resulted in a huge number of unintended consequences. It just doesn't work we should try another approach.
>>
>>>However, that's where my affinity with the man ended.
>
>I'm guessing you don't know much about O'Reilly's actual positions. He wanted tougher sentences for those selling/distributing drugs.
>
>He certainly didn't mince words about even casual drug use, but he focused much of his anger on drug pushers.
>
>Given the impact of pot on teens, I can't fault him for any of his positions.
>
>Looks, here's what it boils down to: drug use (except when prescribed by a licensed physician) is just royally, royally, royally stupid. Drugs destroy the youth, destroys families and communities.

Same as with guns Kevin. Guns/Drugs don't kill people . people do. Why do you need draconian drug laws in a country which routinely sells assault rifles for use "round the house".