>>Given how PP manipulates public figures on %s, the # of abortions they perform, the monies they receive - I think it is reasonable to suspect that some of their funding is being used for elective abortions.
>>This goes back to the issue I mentioned in my prior post to Victor - lack of transparency in their revenue reporting.

It's actually quite a shame. PP has been around for a long time and has done good work. But if I ask colleagues for an impression in 2017, mostly it involves selling of aborted fetus parts for profit and CA lower courts trying to punish the people who made the videos demonstrating it. PP has a big image problem and if they're really into women's health, they might consider dropping the abortions, at least until the dust settles. Otherwise the baby will be going out with the bath water (which could be interpreted as a terrible joke, but isn't.)