>Hi Thomas,
>
>Thanks for the feedback.
>
>I can accept that the post was read despite bringing no feedback. But as you are quite aware, reading without feedback brings little information to the UT post maker:-)

True.
>
>The idea behind the post was "funding an open-source" connectivy between VFP and Sciter in order to buid html-like interfaces in a fully controlled and T-I-G-H-T environment.

OTOH I have made it a personal rule not to involve myself into such ideas/plans/endeavors unless I am either willing to commit myself in some role in the task or I can add something positive to the idea. If somebody is interested in creating stuff, going on before on reasons why I think it is often a bad idea - might stifle something too early. Also role of devils advocate is more natural to me than god of rosy plans and creation - which might be needed if a project is underway, but not before start ;-))


>I am impressed by the sciter achievements in the field of antivirus software from that single unique perspective.

A dedicated+great dev in some areas is well ahead of 3-digit # of competent devs needing a plan.
One reason "benevolent dictator" role has some great achievements from Python to Vue.Js. Perhaps I am overinterpreting the things I read without testing in code, but integrating current JS concepts seem to be less easy in Sciter compared to lean fwks I prefer compared to Angular, Ember and so on. Vfp devs are already painted into a corner - Sciter might be another corner ;-)

rgds


thomas