>>A) Sessions won't keep his mouth shut
LOL. Well, he might now. ;-)
>>B) Even if he could, it won't stop the media from doing everything in their power (including manufacturing stories) to invalidate the 2016 Presidential election
Perhaps Gorka can publicly school WAPO on the roles of Congress and AG, since the authors of this long essay and the WAPO editor/s who passed it, clearly have the wrong end of the stick. But the cynic in me thinks of Trump's stated intention to free up libel laws, notably New York Times v. Sullivan that empowers the MSM to defame him virtually at will. My understanding is that libel provisions are at State level subject only to First Amendment, meaning outside Trump's executive power except via the Supreme Court or Constitutional change. The MSM certainly is contributing a huge portfolio of evidence for any such future attempt and are losing credibility as they do it, so maybe Trump is biding his time? Meanwhile Sarah Palin is suing NYT for defaming her, using their own verbiage as evidence they knew their attack to be false, which outcome may be very useful for public figures who believe they too are systematically defamed by Fake News.
"... They ne'er cared for us
yet: suffer us to famish, and their store-houses
crammed with grain; make edicts for usury, to
support usurers; repeal daily any wholesome act
established against the rich, and provide more
piercing statutes daily, to chain up and restrain
the poor. If the wars eat us not up, they will; and
there's all the love they bear us."
-- Shakespeare: Coriolanus, Act 1, scene 1