>>>Male chauvinism... Male chauvinist:
>
>Try "ad hominem."
>
>FWIW, Bill is from a US generation that put the American woman on a pedestal, glorifying US femininity and setting rules about required behaviors to earn womanly approval.
>
>Big changes started with access to vulnerable women in war torn locales after WWII (even though fraternization was theoretically not allowed) followed by Kinsey, the pill and sexual revolution. Holding open a door became a patronizing oppression rather than a quaint old-fashioned symbol of approval and respect.
>
>Graphic porn followed and became normalized, turning pouting women with their legs spread into a cheap commodity, 5 for $6.50. Now objectification and degrading of women with whole geis effectively free via the internet.
>
>More recently, young female athletes face males who identify as women, sweeping the field in the female events. Perhaps consider the feelings of equality of the girl in Connecticut destined only ever to be second in races rather than the first placings that might have given her scholarship or financial aid for her dream university: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/apr/7/andraya-yearwood-transgender-athlete-stars-on-fema/
>
>Worth noting that had the above athlete competed in the boy races, she would have gotten nowhere.
>
>But still there are some who celebrate, declaring that all this is a sign of equality. For whom? For women?!

Completely missing the point.
Male person says "A woman has no place doing ABC or being in ABC because only a man can do it" = Male chauvinism... Male chauvinist. Put my comments in context with the offending comment. (which you will have to go back and look for as it was conveniently eliminated so it could be taken out of context).