>>Ok - thank you KellyAnne for the deflection and not answering the question - so let me try again:
>>Do you agree that Choen is indeed a liar on this subject or not? Again this is a yes or no question.
If "the subject" is Cohen's statement you quote: "the accusations are entirely and totally false" - then I see zero, nada evidence that he is lying.
You do realize that by that statement to the Senate committee, Cohen was referring to the accusations
against himself - specifically the Prague allegation (lie) that I laid out for you?
Unless you have evidence that he wasn't in California but was in fact in Prague, why would you continue to insist it's a lie?
At least KellyAnne has a clue what she's talking about.
"... They ne'er cared for us
yet: suffer us to famish, and their store-houses
crammed with grain; make edicts for usury, to
support usurers; repeal daily any wholesome act
established against the rich, and provide more
piercing statutes daily, to chain up and restrain
the poor. If the wars eat us not up, they will; and
there's all the love they bear us."
-- Shakespeare: Coriolanus, Act 1, scene 1
