>>>And yes I understand the attempts by people to distance themselves, but that doesn't change the facts...and it would seem clear that those who choose to go around and actually tell lies regarding this in an attempt to skew how close they really were are just making matters worse for themselves and end up appearing more guilty than they would of if they'd just kept their mouth shut to begin with.
>
>You're describing Papadopoulos, not anybody he may have tried to sting. And referring to my earlier scenario involving you and Bill: if you replied "yeah I remember something about you having Russian intel but pretty sure the answer was "no thanks"... maybe something about legality? I can't go against that, so I'm no good to you, sorry."
>
>What can you pin on me from that?
>
>>> None of any of this is going to end well for those involved in this mess, and it's becoming doubtful that Trump's presidency is going to last the whole 4 year term.
>
>So far he's Teflon Man afaics.
>
>>>>I mean the guy got on national TV and did an interview and said he fired Comey because of the Russia investigation (ya know...admitted obstruction). What a freakn moron.
>
>>>Here is the interview
>>>www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Wvuw_Zmubg
>
>He refers 7 times to reasons why Comey is the wrong man for the job, but not once do I hear him say it was because of the Russian investigation- about which he says 3 times that he wants a credible and final conclusion. What are you hearing, and at what point in the interview?

Does anyone know that the congress of the US is debating - sort of- a tax bill, that if passed, will enrich billionaires even more- and do serious damage to millions of middle class tax payers?
Does anyone know that the US is surreptitiously sending troops into countries without war authorization?

Do we really care more about what Paul Manafort might have said over vodka?

5Wvuw_Zmubg