>>The publication that this guy works for wants a Theocracy -- which we do not want (and that is the reason for the desired separation of church and state)
Justuify that claim. A single citation from "the publication the guy works for" will do.
>>Hey you can join whatever threads you want here -- I'm just saying that you're participation on something you did not watch means you're comments on the subject of it's contents will be without merit.
I'm not a carpenter but I can tell whether a table is well made or not. Your version is a warped argumentum ad verecundiam fallacy where watching a potty-mouthed comedian clip apparently is a required qualification to comment on a simplistic topic.
>>..and Zac Davis is an Assistant Editor for that rag of a magazine. ..why don't you go read some of the other things this weirdo has written?
He's a Catholic writing for a Catholic rag of a magazine. You may call that weird or problematic, but that's more of a story about you, and you needn't try to lecture others about freedom of worship. FWIW, he's also written quite a lot about the disordered White House you'd probably agree with.
"... They ne'er cared for us
yet: suffer us to famish, and their store-houses
crammed with grain; make edicts for usury, to
support usurers; repeal daily any wholesome act
established against the rich, and provide more
piercing statutes daily, to chain up and restrain
the poor. If the wars eat us not up, they will; and
there's all the love they bear us."
-- Shakespeare: Coriolanus, Act 1, scene 1