BF>>The voters of Alabama are faced with another of those binary situations. If I were to vote in Alabama I would vote against Jones.
VA>>Wait a second here - are you saying you would vote for Moore, or are you saying you'd vote for a write-in or some other 3rd person here?

There is no write-in or 3rd person in real life. Voting against Jones? That's a tick for Moore. Voting against HRC? That's was a tick for Trump. Millions acted that way and you may scoff and call them all names, but as Churchill observed: democracy is the worst form of government apart from all the others that have been tried from time to time. Such voting also represents a strong pragmatic understanding of the purpose of a senator. It's not just a popularity contest: they think Moore will vote the way they'd want, and Jones won't. They also believe that awful immoral people are using swamp tactics to poison them against Moore and as Bill keeps suggesting, that just strengthens Moore's support.

This is the same point over and over that those inside the bubble walls aren't getting: exquisitely timed pee pee dossiers and character assassination won't always deliver a win after people notice that the timing's the same every time and then Allred is involved or a HRC proxy's fingerprints are found all over it.

FWIW, after this latest episode Jackie Mason described Allred as "“the only person in the world that can make Hillary Clinton sound like an honest human being” and called her a "degenerate." IMHO this is just the beginning as those inside the bubble walls are hoist on the petard of Sullivan Vs NYT making it almost impossible for a journalist to defame a public person. That provision has been used as a one-way-street for a long time, but I'm betting that this is merely the opening salvo of its enthusiastic use against the DNC and sock puppets including in the MSM.