Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Judge Moore
Message
From
10/12/2017 22:44:50
John Ryan
Captain-Cooker Appreciation Society
Taumata Whakatangi ..., New Zealand
 
General information
Forum:
Politics
Category:
Elections
Title:
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01656222
Message ID:
01656261
Views:
38
>>What part of the fact that Moore is a homophobic racist do you not understand?

What part of the fact that he has to be appointed by his fellow Alabamans do you not understand? It's their assessment of his character that counts. Meanwhile show me the Alabamans ripping holes in your HI senators or calling you stupid for voting them in. No? There you are then.

As for racism: show me the quotation. No crafty paraphrases, partisan snips, MSM pilings-up or editorials: just the citation where he shows prejudice against whoever you believe he's racist against to such disgraceful extend that it damns him. If it's just that old bubble favorite the "racist" birther controversy- then Obama's own publicist contributed and AFAICS only loser buffoons would insist it's such awful "racism" you have to damn the man forever.

Meanwhile the US Supreme Court ruled same sex marriage legal in 2015 and here's what Moore said- including a reference to your allegation of racism:

"In 1857, the United States Supreme Court did rule that black people were property. Of course, that contradicted the Constitution, and it took a civil war to overturn it. But this ruling in Obergefell is even worse in a sense because it forces not only people to recognize marriage other than the institution ordained of God and recognized by nearly every state in the union, it says that you now must do away with the definition of marriage and make it between two persons of the same gender or leading on, as one of the dissenting justices said, to polygamy, to multi-partner marriages.
We’ve got to go back and recognize that what they did in Obergefell was not only to create a right that does not exist under the Constitution, but then to mandate that that right compels Christians to give up their religious freedom and liberty."

What do you think of that? Particularly his last clause about religious freedom and liberty with implication re First Amendment? No pejoratives or emotional baggage needed- we know you disagree and think it's stupid, so go ahead and dissect his actual unparaphrased reasoning.

>>And how difficult is it to grasp that voting for a homophobic racist is stupid? I have no (nor should anyone) respect for racists or those who support them.

Which confirms you're still completely missing the point, which is why the DNC is going to keep losing until it escapes its obsolete talking points and listens to what voters outside the walled bubble are saying.
"... They ne'er cared for us
yet: suffer us to famish, and their store-houses
crammed with grain; make edicts for usury, to
support usurers; repeal daily any wholesome act
established against the rich, and provide more
piercing statutes daily, to chain up and restrain
the poor. If the wars eat us not up, they will; and
there's all the love they bear us.
"
-- Shakespeare: Coriolanus, Act 1, scene 1
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform