>>>>The idiots in Alabama would rather have an homophobic racist alleged sexual predator that's been thrown off the bench not once but twice, not to mention a slew of other issues, than a ...OMG...a democrat! What a bunch of looser buffoons.
>>
>>See, that's the sort of thing that grows his support. I've asked you before why he was "thrown off the bench" which you pile together like the fake news story of eight underage sex victims. As you noted, it's because he introduced a giant religious symbol to the courthouse that he refused to take down, and stubbornly acted against same sex marriage. The point you're not getting is that some people would approve of his huge religious symbol and others of his opposition to same sex marriage. Others who agree with neither, would find it honorable that he stuck to his convictions at the cost of his career. Others would say so what, how will he vote in Senate.

First of all he was thown off the bench for violating federal laws - which he took an oath to uphold - then did not. Secondly as far as I'm aware there has only been one news story (which was not part of the original Washington Post story) where the accuser appears to of lied. It would appear that you do not believe that Moore is a sexual predator and want to discount the stories of a large number of people based upon one persons lie. You can't really do that.

>>Meanwhile just as gluing all complainants together in compulsory credibility has the predictable effect when a liar is uncovered, piling lots of this sort of stuff into a conflated attack that may sound convincing to you, is a guaranteed failure in Alabama. You may say it's because they're looser (sic) buffoons, but how does that help you when Moore is elected because things that sound exquisite inside the bubble wall, often sound like slippery snake talk to flyover voters.

Sooo then a bunch of immature looser buffoons then? Waah waaah you say I should vote for a racist so waah waahh I'm gonna vote for him just to show you I CAN vote for a racist. freakn stupid idiots.

>>IMHO what you need to do with flyover voters is never try to stack half truths into a huge conflated tale of woe. Just be straight and on topic. That's what they respect. The first sign of swampy pull-the-wool-over-these-idiots'-eyes tactics and you've lost them.

That only works if they accept the premise of the topic to begin with. For example: A 34 year old dating 14 year old girls is wrong. Racism is bad. ... but see the people of Alabama who support Moore do not consider these problems. Not a lot you can do with that - you can attempt education in the schools but that takes years. You're not going to convince the racists that racism is bad - or the homophobes that some people are simply gay and it's ok, or the religious wack-jobs who think 9/11 happened because it was gods punishment for sodomy is not accurate. ...so you're thinking 'straight to the topic' with these people is rather dependent upon WHAT the topic is - thus they're lost anyways - now and forever relishing in their little bubbles of ignorance bigotry and hate all the while thumping on their bibles claiming some sort of moral superiority. What a crock of crap.

>As someone that was brought up in "Politics Southern Style" I would say you have a real understanding of how things work here.