Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Judge Moore
Message
 
To
11/12/2017 17:46:15
John Ryan
Captain-Cooker Appreciation Society
Taumata Whakatangi ..., New Zealand
General information
Forum:
Politics
Category:
Elections
Title:
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01656222
Message ID:
01656298
Views:
29
>>>A vote for HRC would represent that you accept she did that, yes. ..
>
>You can't weasel out that easily. You've said repeatedly to others that if they believe or vote for Moore, they're voting for racism and homophobia. So, by voting for HRC, you're voting to disbelieve/humiliate/destroy women who complained about being raped.
>
>>>but this is another example of a false equivalency. Moore has a decades long record of being a homophobe and racist, and using his power to violate peoples civil rights whereas HRC has a political track-record of doing a lot of good things for women.
>
>LOL. You make wild allegations of things Moore did wrong that you juxtapose against HRC having done things right- and then talk about false equivalence! Priceless.

I'm explaining the differences in the patterns of behavior.

>Ask yourself why Moore has so many supporters in Alabama if his history is as you say. Then ask yourself why people like Bill voted against HRC. If your response is that it's because they're stupid, then this is why the DNC keeps losing.

What I've said all along is that the American Voter, as a whole, is stupid when it comes to politics. I did not say Bill was stupid - what I said was I think he did something stupid -- you've seen me explain that 100 times so you know better.

>>>It was the same way between HRC and Trump - people attempting to say they both had equal disregard for women when obviously it's not the case.
>
>So you want to juxtapose Trump privately boasting to a Bush scion about what his celebrity status lets him get away with, against HRC publicly disparaging and pursuing women who complained about a rapist, and claim Trump is worse?
>
>Or are you relying on the women who (with Allred in attendance) accused Trump of things like inspecting Miss Universe candidates (he inspected them- before a televised beauty contest? Oh, the cad) or that he was like an octopus in the first class cabin in the 1970s when the stewardess was permanently hovering in first class, to ... remind me what else he did so bad that it's worse than destroying women for daring to complain about their rape?

I'm not going to sit here an explain the difference to you. I've come to the conclusion you're just trying to start sh_it here by saying these you know make no sense.

>>>Moore has bad anti-gay and racism as part of his campaign - HRC did nothing of the sort -- see the difference?
>
>I get that the bubble calls it "anti gay" for religious people to complain that the Supreme Court has breached their First Amendment rights by requiring them to participate in same sex marriage, just as the bubble attacked and brought suits against the Little Sisters of the Poor for not wanting contraception in their healthcare plans. Do I agree? I agree with Moore that moral opposition to a Supreme Court ruling about slaves led to a civil war and I can see what the First Amendment says. As for racism- I can hardly wait to hear the contortions needed to accuse Moore of that....

If you are unaware of Moore's racist comments and behavior then look it up. I told Kevin I was going to chill so I'm not going to explain things to you anymore.
ICQ 10556 (ya), 254117
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform