>>I'm not doing the research for you anymore. Hell it's even all over today's news! and if you can't find it then you are simply not looking. Frankly I think you're just trying to start sh_it.
>
>LOL. You mean Moore's comments from 2011 in response to a reporter's suggestion that all amendments after thr 10th should be abolished? Moore replied "That would eliminate many problems. You know, people don’t understand how some of these amendments have completely tried to wreck the form of government that our forefathers intended."
>
>Now MSM pundits point to the 13th Amendment ending slavery and the 15th Amendment on blacks being allowed to vote... et voila, Moore's a racist!
>
>Just a couple of things. First, notice the word "some". "Some" of these amendments. Not *all* of these amendments. So which helpful soul decided on Moore's behalf that he must be talking about the 13th and 15th? If you know anything about Moore's opinions, I'd say it ought to be obvious that's NOT what he's talking about.
>
>I'm particularly disappointed if you hoovered it down after my Moore quote earlier today when he observed that the Supreme Court's ruling upholding slavery ownership that eventually led to civil war, was illegal under law. Why then pretend that even if he did rail against the need for the 13th- which he didn't- he must be racist?
>But lets not allow facts or reason to get in the way of a juicy hit.
>
>Second, how about the 19th Amendment granting women the vote. If you insist that his response means he's opposed to blacks being freed and voting, surely you also must insist he's opposed to women voting?
>
>Why do you suppose this isn't included as one of the bubble talking points in this hit?

I'm not doing the research for you anymore, if you can't find it then you are simply not looking.
You dispute the assessment that Moore is a sexual predator who preys on young women and a racist (and I assume you probably dispute that he's a homophobe too) and should not be in office and that is that.